An explanation of different layers of Ethereum Governance: open source collaboration, protocol standards governance, Core Dev coordination, nodes running client software, plus extended reading and links.
"Vigorous copyleft serves not just the currently underserved among open source contributors, but the open source movement as a whole, by preserving the broad base that made it relevant to begin with."Permalink
I was reminded today after speaking to Ted Leung that he uses the phrase “commons based peer production” rather than “open source”, because: The problem with the term open source is that everyone means something different when they use it. Some people just mean licensing. Some people think of a particular community’s set of practices. Others think that it means some kind of fuzzy democracy and mob rule. Which of course is exactly what I was trying to capture in my post from last year on Blockchain & Open Source Definitions. Researching that phrase further brought me to a bunch...
This started as a short reply to Erlend S. Heggen’s “The Fair Share Clause - A thought experiment for sustainable open source”, and got long enough that I really did want to capture it in its own blog post. Heggen @erlend_sh is a Community Advocate at Discourse, the open source forum software. The description of Discourse’s end of 2017 donations to open source projects they depend on is also a great read. Kyle Mitchell’s writing and his License Zero project are name checked, and I have posted about them briefly recently, but consider this another reminder that you should look...
I’m going back to my roots in open source and co-founding the Special Projects & Decentralized Engineering Company, or SPADE for short.
Rather than treating attendees just as an audience for lectures, conferences should be a community gathering that invites people to make it an awesome experience. Here are some thoughts on how to include community in your traditional conference format, starting with a bit of history about unconferences.
This post was written as a response to Trent McConaghy’s post, Blockchain as a Field. He starts with this statement: “blockchain” is best used as a label for a field, just like “AI” is the label for the field of artificial intelligence. It was Lisa Cheng1, who opened my eyes to the multiple definitions of blockchain. Roughly paraphrased, here’s what Lisa used as a framework for defining blockchain: Lisa is co-founder of Vanbex; I was an advisor & early investor there. ↩